GIE: training before ever entering the operating room
The GIE research group gathers more than twenty professors and PhD students. They work hard on four large research fields: quantitave evaluation of biomaterials, led by professor Dolors Ayala; Visualization of time-varying multimodal data and virtual tools for teleneurorehabilitation, led by professor Daniela Tost and Computerized Simulation of surgical processes, led by professor Robert Joan.
GIE is a large group within LSI. Talking with their members we realized the volume and diversity of their fascinating innovations and projects. One of them should interest at least the 30% of men over 50 years. Or even the younger ones.
|
Robert, could you give as a little context about the research you are carrying on in computerized simulation of chirurgic processes? |
Could you explain how does this prototype work? |
|
Moreover, the surgical processes for this condition pose the usual problems and complications of open surgery: possible infections and a long recovery. Nowadays there is intense research under way in order to develop mininimally invassive technique, that avoid large incisions and suture. For example, cryogenic surgery allows doctors to inject through the urethra liquid nitrogen (at very low temperature) that actually burns cancer cells. Problem is that it is very difficult to control both the amount of liquid gas used and where it is applied, which can result in collateral injuries or partial removal of the malignant cells. Both mistakes could result in inconveniences for the patient or a need for a second operation. Because of that there is a tendency to stick to more conservative techniques, which brings us back to the problem of open surgery.
The techinque involves introducing through the patient’s urethra both the scalpel, a fiber optic camera and like and a jet of water that is used to remove the discarded cells. This is a highly effective treatment with little secondary effects. However it hinges critically on the ability and experience of the surgeon. A badly located cut of the hoe could damage permanently a sphincter or perforate the prostate capsule. Surgeons new to this technique have a big difficulty since it is impossible to train with a live patient in front of you and it working as a side surgeon to a more experienced one is too risky and brings little learning, since most of the technique reolves around a fine sensing of the behaviour of the surgical tool. No experienced surgeon can make for a novice’s fault since there is almost no room, nor time for a repair, as it it is usually the case in open surgery.
|
Currently we have a first prototype but we keep working on it because, after putting it to test we have spotted several details that we think can be improved. We started with a simulator that shows the diseased area. With it, the surgeon could train himself in the actual operation of the “hoe”. This first prototype however, used a very simple keyboard interface which doesn’t replicate the actual controls of the tool, and specifically it doesn’t replicate the feeling of its movement and resistance. In fact, the real tool looks very much like a gun. The surgical tool, fiber optics light source, camera, etc. do spring out of its tip. This is not precisely the same as a computer keyboard. At least what we had with this first prototype was the whole model of the prostate and the dynamics of cutting and dragging the “hoe”. So, what we are doing now is to work hard in order to reproduce much better the real interaction with the surgical tools. We have used a haptic device that creates a very realistic feeling of pressure and resistance. With this it will be possible to recover the actual sensation that one has when sticking the surgical hoe in the cancer cells and dragging it back. We are also working at creating a more realistic model of the atprosthe characteristics. Our first model was a rigid one. Now we are creating a elastic model that reproduces the real characteristics of the prostate. In this way we will reproduce very realistically the actual behaviour of the surgical tool on a elastic, organic surface. Elasticity is different on healthy and sick tissues.
To know some more...
http://www.lsi.upc.edu/~robert |
